Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST CATHERINES REHAB HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST CATHERINES REHAB HOSPITAL
CCN 103026 | FL | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.8M → Pro Forma $-2.7M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$38.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$676K
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$767K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$760K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$467K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$767K$767K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$738K$21K$760K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$118K$349K$467K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$192K$384K$575K$767K$767K$767K$767K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$190K$380K$570K$760K$760K$760K$760K
A/R Days Reduction$0$156K$311K$467K$467K$467K$467K$467K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$550K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.8M$-4.8M-12.4%
Year 1$-4.9M+$1.3M$-3.6M-9.3%
Year 2$-5.0M+$2.0M$-3.0M-7.9%
Year 3$-5.2M+$2.0M$-3.2M-8.3%
Year 4$-5.4M+$2.0M$-3.3M-8.7%
Year 5$-5.5M+$2.0M$-3.5M-9.1%
$-47.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-38.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.1M
Value Created
$-3.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-7.6M
Organic Growth
$20.2M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$384K$575K$767K$921K
Denial Rate Reductio$380K$570K$760K$912K
A/R Days Reduction$233K$350K$467K$560K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$25K$29K
Total$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 106 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.4%-10.1%5.0%13.1%
P22
Net-to-Gross67.5%15.6%25.2%44.1%
P85
Occupancy48.7%49.0%63.8%81.3%
P25
Rev/Bed$639K$239K$504K$972K
P66
Exp/Bed$719K$268K$527K$935K
P65

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML