Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - THE VILLAGES 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - THE VILLAGES
CCN 102028 | FL | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $675K → Pro Forma $1.8M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$21.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$675K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$834K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$844K
Risk-Adjusted
-$301K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$435K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$431K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$265K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$435K$435K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$419K$12K$431K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$67K$198K$265K$834K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$109K$218K$326K$435K$435K$435K$435K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$108K$215K$323K$431K$431K$431K$431K
A/R Days Reduction$0$88K$176K$265K$265K$265K$265K$265K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$312K$623K$928K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x78% / 17.6x82% / 19.9x86% / 22.3x88% / 23.4x90% / 24.6x
9.0x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.4x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.5x85% / 21.5x
10.0x68% / 13.4x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x80% / 19.0x
11.0x64% / 11.9x69% / 13.6x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x76% / 17.0x
12.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.4x
Headroom (turns)
52%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 52% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.1x, adding 5.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$675K$675K3.1%
Year 1$696K+$763K$1.5M6.7%
Year 2$717K+$1.1M$1.9M8.6%
Year 3$738K+$1.1M$1.9M8.7%
Year 4$760K+$1.1M$1.9M8.8%
Year 5$783K+$1.1M$1.9M8.9%
$6.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$21.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.4M
Value Created
$1.9M
Exit EBITDA
$1.1M
Organic Growth
$11.4M
RCM Value Creation
$1.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$218K$326K$435K$522K
Denial Rate Reductio$215K$323K$431K$517K
A/R Days Reduction$132K$199K$265K$318K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$14K$17K
Total$572K$858K$1.1M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 79 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.1%-18.7%1.8%11.8%
P53
Net-to-Gross21.8%19.6%33.8%60.0%
P35
Occupancy82.9%43.7%60.4%81.7%
P77
Rev/Bed$544K$235K$481K$639K
P59
Exp/Bed$527K$316K$510K$939K
P51

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML