Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH -TALLAHASSEE INC. 2026-04-26 06:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH -TALLAHASSEE INC.
CCN 102020 | FL | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $-890K → Pro Forma $416K (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-890K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$416K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$952K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$938K
Risk-Adjusted
-$367K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$496K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$491K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$302K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$496K$496K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$478K$14K$491K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$76K$226K$302K$952K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT59.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$124K$248K$372K$496K$496K$496K$496K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$123K$246K$369K$491K$491K$491K$491K
A/R Days Reduction$0$101K$201K$302K$302K$302K$302K$302K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$356K$711K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-18.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
24.6x
Headroom (turns)
379%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 379% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -18.1x, adding 117.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-890K$-890K-3.6%
Year 1$-916K+$870K$-46K-0.2%
Year 2$-944K+$1.3M$362K1.5%
Year 3$-972K+$1.3M$333K1.3%
Year 4$-1.0M+$1.3M$304K1.2%
Year 5$-1.0M+$1.3M$274K1.1%
$-8.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.9M
Value Created
$274K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.4M
Organic Growth
$13.1M
RCM Value Creation
$274K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$248K$372K$496K$596K
Denial Rate Reductio$246K$369K$491K$590K
A/R Days Reduction$151K$226K$302K$362K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$653K$979K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.6%-15.7%3.2%11.8%
P33
Net-to-Gross15.7%15.8%29.8%59.2%
P22
Occupancy74.4%47.8%61.6%80.8%
P67
Rev/Bed$517K$241K$487K$785K
P55
Exp/Bed$536K$280K$510K$943K
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML