Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL OCALA 2026-04-26 09:52 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINDRED HOSPITAL OCALA
CCN 102019 | FL | 31 beds | Current EBITDA $1.6M → Pro Forma $2.0M (+$455K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$8.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$455K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+535bps
Margin Improvement
$326K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$455K
Modeled Uplift
$295K
Risk-Adjusted
-$160K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$172K
+202bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$170K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$104K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+11bp
Total EBITDA Impact$455K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$164K$8K$172K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$170K$170K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$26K$77K$104K$326K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$43K$86K$129K$172K$172K$172K$172K
Cost to Collect$0$43K$85K$128K$170K$170K$170K$170K
A/R Days Reduction$0$35K$69K$104K$104K$104K$104K$104K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$125K$250K$370K$455K$455K$455K$455K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $455K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
9.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.0x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.6M$1.6M18.2%
Year 1$1.6M+$304K$1.9M22.3%
Year 2$1.6M+$455K$2.1M24.7%
Year 3$1.7M+$455K$2.1M25.3%
Year 4$1.7M+$455K$2.2M25.9%
Year 5$1.8M+$455K$2.3M26.5%
$15.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$24.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.3M
Value Created
$2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$2.5M
Organic Growth
$4.6M
RCM Value Creation
$2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$86K$129K$172K$206K
Cost to Collect$85K$128K$170K$204K
A/R Days Reduction$52K$78K$104K$124K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$228K$341K$455K$546K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.2%-26.7%-1.9%7.4%
P93
Net-to-Gross25.3%20.2%29.4%58.3%
P42
Occupancy43.0%33.3%56.3%80.3%
P33
Rev/Bed$274K$257K$502K$648K
P27
Exp/Bed$224K$401K$536K$996K
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML