Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF SARASOTA 2026-04-26 14:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF SARASOTA
CCN 102018 | FL | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $3.6M → Pro Forma $5.0M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$337K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$526K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$520K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$320K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$526K$526K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$506K$14K$520K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$81K$239K$320K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$131K$263K$394K$526K$526K$526K$526K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$130K$260K$390K$520K$520K$520K$520K
A/R Days Reduction$0$107K$213K$320K$320K$320K$320K$320K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$377K$753K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.6M$3.6M13.7%
Year 1$3.7M+$922K$4.6M17.6%
Year 2$3.8M+$1.4M$5.2M19.8%
Year 3$3.9M+$1.4M$5.3M20.2%
Year 4$4.0M+$1.4M$5.4M20.6%
Year 5$4.2M+$1.4M$5.5M21.1%
$35.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$61.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$25.1M
Value Created
$5.5M
Exit EBITDA
$5.7M
Organic Growth
$13.8M
RCM Value Creation
$5.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$263K$394K$526K$631K
Denial Rate Reductio$260K$390K$520K$624K
A/R Days Reduction$160K$240K$320K$384K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$13K$17K$20K
Total$691K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 79 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.7%-18.7%1.8%11.8%
P79
Net-to-Gross29.4%19.6%33.8%60.0%
P45
Occupancy87.7%43.7%60.4%81.7%
P84
Rev/Bed$657K$235K$481K$639K
P76
Exp/Bed$567K$316K$510K$939K
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML