Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MADISON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MADISON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 101311 | FL | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.4M → Pro Forma $-1.8M (+$610K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$610K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+530bps
Margin Improvement
$441K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$610K
Modeled Uplift
$393K
Risk-Adjusted
-$216K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$230K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$230K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$140K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$610K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$230K$230K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$222K$8K$230K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$35K$105K$140K$441K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$58K$115K$173K$230K$230K$230K$230K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$57K$115K$172K$230K$230K$230K$230K
A/R Days Reduction$0$47K$93K$140K$140K$140K$140K$140K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$166K$333K$495K$610K$610K$610K$610K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $610K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.4M$-2.4M-21.1%
Year 1$-2.5M+$406K$-2.1M-18.2%
Year 2$-2.6M+$610K$-2.0M-17.1%
Year 3$-2.7M+$610K$-2.0M-17.8%
Year 4$-2.7M+$610K$-2.1M-18.5%
Year 5$-2.8M+$610K$-2.2M-19.2%
$-24.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-24.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$22K
Value Created
$-2.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.9M
Organic Growth
$6.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$115K$173K$230K$276K
Denial Rate Reductio$115K$172K$230K$276K
A/R Days Reduction$70K$105K$140K$168K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$305K$457K$610K$731K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-21.1%-24.8%-1.6%9.1%
P29
Net-to-Gross49.3%22.0%32.9%58.7%
P64
Occupancy37.0%29.1%55.0%74.2%
P29
Rev/Bed$460K$228K$497K$753K
P45
Exp/Bed$557K$296K$510K$1.0M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML