Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAKE BUTLER HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAKE BUTLER HOSPITAL
CCN 101303 | FL | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $1.9M (+$682K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$682K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$496K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$682K
Modeled Uplift
$428K
Risk-Adjusted
-$254K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$259K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$257K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$157K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$682K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$259K$259K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$249K$8K$257K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$40K$118K$157K$496K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT58.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$65K$129K$194K$259K$259K$259K$259K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$64K$129K$193K$257K$257K$257K$257K
A/R Days Reduction$0$52K$105K$157K$157K$157K$157K$157K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$186K$372K$554K$682K$682K$682K$682K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $682K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
9.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.7x
10.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
11.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
12.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M9.4%
Year 1$1.3M+$455K$1.7M13.2%
Year 2$1.3M+$682K$2.0M15.3%
Year 3$1.3M+$682K$2.0M15.6%
Year 4$1.4M+$682K$2.1M15.9%
Year 5$1.4M+$682K$2.1M16.2%
$12.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$23.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.9M
Value Created
$2.1M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$6.8M
RCM Value Creation
$2.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$129K$194K$259K$310K
Denial Rate Reductio$129K$193K$257K$308K
A/R Days Reduction$79K$118K$157K$189K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$341K$512K$682K$819K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.4%-24.8%-1.6%9.1%
P74
Net-to-Gross37.1%22.0%32.9%58.7%
P55
Occupancy27.3%29.1%55.0%74.2%
P21
Rev/Bed$517K$228K$497K$753K
P57
Exp/Bed$468K$296K$510K$1.0M
P38

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML