Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UCF LAKE NONA HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UCF LAKE NONA HOSPITAL
CCN 100350 | FL | 64 beds | Current EBITDA $1.5M → Pro Forma $5.7M (+$4.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$80.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$4.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Bed Count. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.8M (vs $4.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$977K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$51K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.6M$1.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$44K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$246K$731K$977K$3.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$51K$51K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$401K$803K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$397K$795K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$326K$651K$977K$977K$977K$977K$977K
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K$51K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.4M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M$4.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x92% / 26.1x97% / 29.4x101% / 32.6x103% / 34.3x105% / 35.9x
9.0x87% / 22.9x92% / 25.8x96% / 28.7x98% / 30.1x99% / 31.6x
10.0x83% / 20.2x87% / 22.9x91% / 25.5x93% / 26.8x95% / 28.1x
11.0x78% / 18.1x83% / 20.5x87% / 22.9x89% / 24.1x91% / 25.2x
12.0x75% / 16.3x79% / 18.5x83% / 20.7x85% / 21.8x87% / 22.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.3x
Headroom (turns)
66%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 66% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.2x, adding 6.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.5M$1.5M1.8%
Year 1$1.5M+$2.8M$4.3M5.4%
Year 2$1.6M+$4.2M$5.8M7.2%
Year 3$1.6M+$4.2M$5.8M7.3%
Year 4$1.7M+$4.2M$5.9M7.3%
Year 5$1.7M+$4.2M$5.9M7.4%
$14.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$65.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$50.5M
Value Created
$5.9M
Exit EBITDA
$2.4M
Organic Growth
$42.2M
RCM Value Creation
$5.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$803K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$795K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$488K$733K$977K$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$39K$51K$62K
Total$2.1M$3.2M$4.2M$5.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 110 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.8%-9.4%5.0%12.8%
P42
Net-to-Gross10.5%15.7%24.5%44.1%
P10
Occupancy48.7%50.9%64.1%81.3%
P21
Rev/Bed$1.3M$239K$506K$1.0M
P86
Exp/Bed$1.2M$280K$533K$969K
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML