Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OVIEDO MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OVIEDO MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100329 | FL | 64 beds | Current EBITDA $8.2M → Pro Forma $14.0M (+$5.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$110.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$5.8M
Modeled Uplift
$4.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.4M (vs $5.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$71K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.2M$2.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.1M$61K$2.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$340K$1.0M$1.3M$4.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$71K$71K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$555K$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$549K$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$450K$900K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$36K$71K$71K$71K$71K$71K$71K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.7M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.0x
9.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
10.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
11.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
12.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
24%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 24% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.2M$8.2M7.4%
Year 1$8.4M+$3.9M$12.3M11.1%
Year 2$8.7M+$5.8M$14.5M13.1%
Year 3$8.9M+$5.8M$14.8M13.3%
Year 4$9.2M+$5.8M$15.0M13.5%
Year 5$9.5M+$5.8M$15.3M13.8%
$81.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$168.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$86.7M
Value Created
$15.3M
Exit EBITDA
$13.0M
Organic Growth
$58.4M
RCM Value Creation
$15.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$675K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$36K$53K$71K$85K
Total$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$7.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 110 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.4%-9.4%5.0%12.8%
P59
Net-to-Gross11.3%15.7%24.5%44.1%
P12
Occupancy81.5%50.9%64.1%81.3%
P75
Rev/Bed$1.7M$239K$506K$1.0M
P94
Exp/Bed$1.6M$280K$533K$969K
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML