Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENTS CLAY COUNTY 2026-04-26 06:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENTS CLAY COUNTY
CCN 100321 | FL | 134 beds | Current EBITDA $4.0M → Pro Forma $12.1M (+$8.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$152.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$8.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$8.0M
Modeled Uplift
$5.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.7M (vs $8.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$98K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$8.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.1M$3.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.9M$84K$3.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$469K$1.4M$1.9M$5.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$98K$98K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$764K$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$757K$1.5M$2.3M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$620K$1.2M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$49K$98K$98K$98K$98K$98K$98K
Cumulative$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.5M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $8.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x82% / 19.8x86% / 22.4x90% / 24.9x92% / 26.2x94% / 27.5x
9.0x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.5x85% / 21.8x87% / 22.9x89% / 24.1x
10.0x72% / 15.2x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.3x83% / 20.3x84% / 21.4x
11.0x68% / 13.5x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.2x79% / 18.2x80% / 19.1x
12.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.7x
Headroom (turns)
57%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 57% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.8x, adding 5.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.0M$4.0M2.6%
Year 1$4.2M+$5.4M$9.5M6.2%
Year 2$4.3M+$8.0M$12.3M8.1%
Year 3$4.4M+$8.0M$12.5M8.1%
Year 4$4.5M+$8.0M$12.6M8.2%
Year 5$4.7M+$8.0M$12.7M8.3%
$40.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$139.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$99.6M
Value Created
$12.7M
Exit EBITDA
$6.4M
Organic Growth
$80.4M
RCM Value Creation
$12.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.5M$2.3M$3.0M$3.6M
A/R Days Reduction$930K$1.4M$1.9M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$49K$73K$98K$117K
Total$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 123 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.6%-4.9%5.3%15.7%
P44
Net-to-Gross15.4%10.6%18.5%32.1%
P39
Occupancy66.2%50.9%64.1%75.4%
P54
Rev/Bed$1.1M$424K$905K$1.3M
P62
Exp/Bed$1.1M$443K$835K$1.1M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML