Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENTS SOUTHSIDE HO 2026-04-26 06:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION ST. VINCENTS SOUTHSIDE HO
CCN 100307 | FL | 230 beds | Current EBITDA $-3.3M → Pro Forma $9.2M (+$12.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$237.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-3.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$12.5M
Modeled Uplift
$8.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.3M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.2M (vs $12.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$152K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.8M$4.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.6M$131K$4.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$729K$2.2M$2.9M$9.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$152K$152K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT21.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.5M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$964K$1.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$76K$152K$152K$152K$152K$152K$152K
Cumulative$0$3.4M$6.8M$10.1M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-3.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.6x
Headroom (turns)
147%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 147% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -3.1x, adding 102.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-3.3M$-3.3M-1.4%
Year 1$-3.4M+$8.3M$4.9M2.1%
Year 2$-3.5M+$12.5M$9.0M3.8%
Year 3$-3.6M+$12.5M$8.9M3.7%
Year 4$-3.7M+$12.5M$8.8M3.7%
Year 5$-3.9M+$12.5M$8.6M3.6%
$-33.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$95.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$128.3M
Value Created
$8.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-5.3M
Organic Growth
$125.0M
RCM Value Creation
$8.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.4M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.5M
Clean Claim Rate$76K$114K$152K$182K
Total$6.2M$9.4M$12.5M$15.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 115 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.4%-4.5%3.9%16.9%
P33
Net-to-Gross15.4%10.1%14.4%21.2%
P54
Occupancy49.4%52.7%63.8%74.8%
P16
Rev/Bed$1.0M$747K$1.1M$1.3M
P45
Exp/Bed$1.0M$726K$944K$1.2M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML