Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. CLOUD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. CLOUD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100302 | FL | 84 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $6.3M (+$5.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$97.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$5.1M
Modeled Uplift
$3.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.7M (vs $5.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$62K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.9M$53K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$298K$884K$1.2M$3.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$62K$62K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$486K$971K$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$481K$962K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$394K$788K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$31K$62K$62K$62K$62K$62K$62K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x106% / 37.3x111% / 41.8x115% / 46.3x117% / 48.5x119% / 50.8x
9.0x101% / 32.8x106% / 36.8x110% / 40.8x112% / 42.8x114% / 44.8x
10.0x96% / 29.1x101% / 32.8x105% / 36.4x107% / 38.2x109% / 40.0x
11.0x92% / 26.2x97% / 29.5x101% / 32.8x103% / 34.4x105% / 36.0x
12.0x88% / 23.8x93% / 26.8x97% / 29.8x99% / 31.2x101% / 32.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.9x
Headroom (turns)
76%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 76% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.6x, adding 6.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M1.2%
Year 1$1.2M+$3.4M$4.6M4.7%
Year 2$1.2M+$5.1M$6.3M6.5%
Year 3$1.3M+$5.1M$6.4M6.6%
Year 4$1.3M+$5.1M$6.4M6.6%
Year 5$1.4M+$5.1M$6.5M6.7%
$11.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$71.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$59.4M
Value Created
$6.5M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$51.1M
RCM Value Creation
$6.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$971K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$962K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$591K$887K$1.2M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$31K$47K$62K$75K
Total$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 120 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.2%-9.4%2.6%11.8%
P43
Net-to-Gross13.3%13.9%20.6%37.3%
P22
Occupancy76.1%48.7%62.6%77.2%
P72
Rev/Bed$1.2M$305K$573K$1.1M
P76
Exp/Bed$1.1M$343K$625K$1.1M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML