Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DOCTORS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DOCTORS HOSPITAL
CCN 100296 | FL | 130 beds | Current EBITDA $2.4M → Pro Forma $15.5M (+$13.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$250.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$13.2M
Modeled Uplift
$8.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.9M (vs $13.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$160K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.0M$5.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.8M$138K$5.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$767K$2.3M$3.0M$9.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$160K$160K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$80K$160K$160K$160K$160K$160K$160K
Cumulative$0$3.6M$7.2M$10.7M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M$13.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x115% / 46.0x120% / 51.4x124% / 56.9x127% / 59.6x129% / 62.4x
9.0x110% / 40.5x114% / 45.4x119% / 50.2x121% / 52.6x123% / 55.1x
10.0x105% / 36.1x110% / 40.5x114% / 44.9x116% / 47.0x118% / 49.2x
11.0x101% / 32.5x105% / 36.5x110% / 40.5x112% / 42.5x114% / 44.5x
12.0x97% / 29.6x101% / 33.2x106% / 36.8x108% / 38.7x110% / 40.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.2x
Headroom (turns)
80%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 80% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.3x, adding 7.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.4M$2.4M0.9%
Year 1$2.4M+$8.8M$11.2M4.5%
Year 2$2.5M+$13.2M$15.7M6.3%
Year 3$2.6M+$13.2M$15.7M6.3%
Year 4$2.7M+$13.2M$15.8M6.3%
Year 5$2.7M+$13.2M$15.9M6.4%
$23.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$174.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$151.2M
Value Created
$15.9M
Exit EBITDA
$3.8M
Organic Growth
$131.5M
RCM Value Creation
$15.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$5.9M
A/R Days Reduction$1.5M$2.3M$3.0M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$80K$120K$160K$192K
Total$6.6M$9.9M$13.2M$15.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 126 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.9%-5.5%4.8%14.9%
P39
Net-to-Gross25.6%10.6%18.6%32.7%
P66
Occupancy49.1%50.8%63.8%75.4%
P21
Rev/Bed$1.9M$414K$885K$1.3M
P91
Exp/Bed$1.9M$439K$843K$1.2M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML