Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SACRED HEART EMERALD COAST 2026-04-26 14:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SACRED HEART EMERALD COAST
CCN 100292 | FL | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $30.3M → Pro Forma $40.2M (+$9.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$187.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$30.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$40.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$9.9M
Modeled Uplift
$7.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.1M (vs $9.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$120K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.8M$3.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.6M$103K$3.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$577K$1.7M$2.3M$7.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$120K$120K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$940K$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$930K$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$762K$1.5M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$60K$120K$120K$120K$120K$120K$120K
Cumulative$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.0M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M$9.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
9.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$30.3M$30.3M16.1%
Year 1$31.2M+$6.6M$37.8M20.1%
Year 2$32.2M+$9.9M$42.1M22.4%
Year 3$33.1M+$9.9M$43.0M22.9%
Year 4$34.1M+$9.9M$44.0M23.4%
Year 5$35.2M+$9.9M$45.1M24.0%
$303.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$495.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$192.2M
Value Created
$45.1M
Exit EBITDA
$48.3M
Organic Growth
$98.9M
RCM Value Creation
$45.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$4.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$60K$90K$120K$144K
Total$4.9M$7.4M$9.9M$11.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 123 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.1%-10.0%2.8%11.8%
P83
Net-to-Gross18.3%15.3%22.5%38.6%
P34
Occupancy62.3%50.2%63.5%77.2%
P48
Rev/Bed$2.3M$247K$550K$1.1M
P98
Exp/Bed$2.0M$324K$574K$1.1M
P97

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML