Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE VILLAGES REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE VILLAGES REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 100290 | FL | 277 beds | Current EBITDA $4.7M → Pro Forma $16.2M (+$11.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$218.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$16.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$11.5M
Modeled Uplift
$8.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.0M (vs $11.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$140K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.4M$4.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.2M$120K$4.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$672K$2.0M$2.7M$8.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$140K$140K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$888K$1.8M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$70K$140K$140K$140K$140K$140K$140K
Cumulative$0$3.1M$6.3M$9.3M$11.5M$11.5M$11.5M$11.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x88% / 23.3x92% / 26.2x96% / 29.2x98% / 30.7x100% / 32.1x
9.0x83% / 20.4x87% / 23.0x91% / 25.6x93% / 26.9x95% / 28.2x
10.0x78% / 18.0x83% / 20.4x87% / 22.7x89% / 23.9x90% / 25.1x
11.0x74% / 16.1x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.4x85% / 21.4x86% / 22.5x
12.0x71% / 14.4x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.1x
Headroom (turns)
62%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 62% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.4x, adding 6.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.7M$4.7M2.1%
Year 1$4.8M+$7.7M$12.5M5.7%
Year 2$4.9M+$11.5M$16.5M7.5%
Year 3$5.1M+$11.5M$16.6M7.6%
Year 4$5.2M+$11.5M$16.8M7.7%
Year 5$5.4M+$11.5M$16.9M7.7%
$46.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$186.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$139.5M
Value Created
$16.9M
Exit EBITDA
$7.4M
Organic Growth
$115.1M
RCM Value Creation
$16.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.2M$3.3M$4.3M$5.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$70K$105K$140K$168K
Total$5.8M$8.6M$11.5M$13.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 107 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.1%-4.8%3.2%17.3%
P47
Net-to-Gross20.5%10.0%14.2%20.5%
P75
Occupancy68.8%53.1%64.9%75.4%
P64
Rev/Bed$790K$832K$1.2M$1.4M
P21
Exp/Bed$773K$764K$972K$1.3M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML