Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST MARYS MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 08:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST MARYS MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100288 | FL | 370 beds | Current EBITDA $69.7M → Pro Forma $93.2M (+$23.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$446.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$69.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$93.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$23.5M
Modeled Uplift
$16.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.0M (vs $23.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$286K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.9M$8.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.6M$246K$8.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.1M$5.4M$17.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$286K$286K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$143K$286K$286K$286K$286K$286K$286K
Cumulative$0$6.4M$12.8M$19.1M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.9x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$69.7M$69.7M15.6%
Year 1$71.8M+$15.7M$87.4M19.6%
Year 2$73.9M+$23.5M$97.4M21.8%
Year 3$76.1M+$23.5M$99.6M22.3%
Year 4$78.4M+$23.5M$101.9M22.8%
Year 5$80.8M+$23.5M$104.3M23.3%
$696.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.15B
Exit EV (11x)
$450.2M
Value Created
$104.3M
Exit EBITDA
$111.0M
Organic Growth
$235.0M
RCM Value Creation
$104.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$10.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$10.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$143K$214K$286K$343K
Total$11.7M$17.6M$23.5M$28.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 95 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.6%-4.8%4.4%19.6%
P69
Net-to-Gross14.2%9.9%14.2%20.4%
P50
Occupancy64.5%57.4%66.2%75.4%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.2M$911K$1.2M$1.4M
P56
Exp/Bed$1.0M$824K$1.0M$1.3M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML