Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MIRAMAR 2026-04-26 08:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HOSPITAL MIRAMAR
CCN 100285 | FL | 178 beds | Current EBITDA $37.4M → Pro Forma $51.5M (+$14.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$267.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$37.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$51.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$14.1M
Modeled Uplift
$10.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.0M (vs $14.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$171K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.3M$5.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.1M$147K$5.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$821K$2.4M$3.3M$10.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$171K$171K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT22.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$86K$171K$171K$171K$171K$171K$171K
Cumulative$0$3.8M$7.7M$11.4M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M$14.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
9.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
11.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$37.4M$37.4M14.0%
Year 1$38.5M+$9.4M$47.9M17.9%
Year 2$39.7M+$14.1M$53.8M20.1%
Year 3$40.9M+$14.1M$55.0M20.6%
Year 4$42.1M+$14.1M$56.2M21.0%
Year 5$43.4M+$14.1M$57.5M21.5%
$374.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$632.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$257.7M
Value Created
$57.5M
Exit EBITDA
$59.6M
Organic Growth
$140.7M
RCM Value Creation
$57.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.7M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.6M$4.0M$5.3M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.3M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$86K$128K$171K$205K
Total$7.0M$10.6M$14.1M$16.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 123 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.0%-5.7%3.8%17.1%
P70
Net-to-Gross16.9%10.1%15.4%22.0%
P54
Occupancy69.5%51.8%64.3%75.6%
P65
Rev/Bed$1.5M$692K$1.0M$1.3M
P84
Exp/Bed$1.3M$654K$915K$1.2M
P80

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML