Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BROWARD HEALTH CORAL SPRINGS 2026-04-26 08:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BROWARD HEALTH CORAL SPRINGS
CCN 100276 | FL | 228 beds | Current EBITDA $-10.1M → Pro Forma $1.3M (+$11.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$217.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-10.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$11.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$11.4M
Modeled Uplift
$7.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.8M (vs $11.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$139K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$11.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.3M$4.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.2M$119K$4.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$667K$2.0M$2.6M$8.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$139K$139K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT21.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.2M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$881K$1.8M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$70K$139K$139K$139K$139K$139K$139K
Cumulative$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.3M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M$11.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $11.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-66.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
72.9x
Headroom (turns)
1122%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1122% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -66.4x, adding 165.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-10.1M$-10.1M-4.7%
Year 1$-10.4M+$7.6M$-2.8M-1.3%
Year 2$-10.8M+$11.4M$674K0.3%
Year 3$-11.1M+$11.4M$351K0.2%
Year 4$-11.4M+$11.4M$19K0.0%
Year 5$-11.8M+$11.4M$-323K-0.1%
$-101.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$97.8M
Value Created
$-323K
Exit EBITDA
$-16.1M
Organic Growth
$114.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-323K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.2M$3.3M$4.3M$5.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.2M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$70K$104K$139K$167K
Total$5.7M$8.6M$11.4M$13.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 116 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.7%-4.4%4.4%17.1%
P24
Net-to-Gross18.5%10.1%14.5%21.2%
P61
Occupancy64.3%52.8%63.9%75.1%
P51
Rev/Bed$953K$746K$1.1M$1.3M
P40
Exp/Bed$997K$715K$942K$1.2M
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML