Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA PALMS WEST HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA PALMS WEST HOSPITAL
CCN 100269 | FL | 206 beds | Current EBITDA $77.7M → Pro Forma $89.9M (+$12.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$233.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$77.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$89.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$12.3M
Modeled Uplift
$8.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.8M (vs $12.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$149K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.7M$4.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.5M$128K$4.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$715K$2.1M$2.8M$8.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$149K$149K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT21.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$946K$1.9M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$75K$149K$149K$149K$149K$149K$149K
Cumulative$0$3.3M$6.7M$9.9M$12.3M$12.3M$12.3M$12.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
9.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$77.7M$77.7M33.3%
Year 1$80.0M+$8.2M$88.2M37.8%
Year 2$82.4M+$12.3M$94.7M40.6%
Year 3$84.9M+$12.3M$97.1M41.7%
Year 4$87.4M+$12.3M$99.7M42.8%
Year 5$90.0M+$12.3M$102.3M43.9%
$776.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.13B
Exit EV (11x)
$348.6M
Value Created
$102.3M
Exit EBITDA
$123.7M
Organic Growth
$122.6M
RCM Value Creation
$102.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$5.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
Clean Claim Rate$75K$112K$149K$179K
Total$6.1M$9.2M$12.3M$14.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 123 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin33.3%-6.0%3.7%16.9%
P92
Net-to-Gross9.9%10.1%14.8%21.3%
P21
Occupancy75.4%52.7%64.1%75.2%
P76
Rev/Bed$1.1M$743K$1.1M$1.3M
P51
Exp/Bed$755K$709K$944K$1.2M
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML