Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEASE HOSPITAL COUNTRYSIDE 2026-04-26 06:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEASE HOSPITAL COUNTRYSIDE
CCN 100265 | FL | 375 beds | Current EBITDA $48.7M → Pro Forma $70.5M (+$21.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$413.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$48.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$70.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$21.7M
Modeled Uplift
$14.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.3M (vs $21.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$264K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.3M$8.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.0M$227K$8.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.8M$5.0M$15.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$264K$264K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$4.1M$6.1M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$132K$264K$264K$264K$264K$264K$264K
Cumulative$0$5.9M$11.8M$17.6M$21.7M$21.7M$21.7M$21.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x65% / 12.4x
9.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x
12.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$48.7M$48.7M11.8%
Year 1$50.2M+$14.5M$64.7M15.7%
Year 2$51.7M+$21.7M$73.4M17.8%
Year 3$53.2M+$21.7M$75.0M18.1%
Year 4$54.8M+$21.7M$76.6M18.5%
Year 5$56.5M+$21.7M$78.2M18.9%
$487.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$860.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$373.1M
Value Created
$78.2M
Exit EBITDA
$77.6M
Organic Growth
$217.3M
RCM Value Creation
$78.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.1M$6.2M$8.3M$9.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.1M$6.1M$8.2M$9.8M
A/R Days Reduction$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$6.0M
Clean Claim Rate$132K$198K$264K$317K
Total$10.9M$16.3M$21.7M$26.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 97 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.8%-4.7%4.5%19.1%
P61
Net-to-Gross23.3%10.0%14.2%20.4%
P86
Occupancy56.9%57.4%65.7%75.3%
P24
Rev/Bed$1.1M$903K$1.2M$1.4M
P43
Exp/Bed$972K$823K$1.0M$1.3M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML