Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OAK HILL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OAK HILL HOSPITAL
CCN 100264 | FL | 350 beds | Current EBITDA $101.7M → Pro Forma $120.7M (+$18.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$359.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$101.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$120.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$18.9M
Modeled Uplift
$13.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.5M (vs $18.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$230K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.2M$7.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.9M$198K$7.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.3M$4.4M$13.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$230K$230K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$115K$230K$230K$230K$230K$230K$230K
Cumulative$0$5.2M$10.3M$15.4M$18.9M$18.9M$18.9M$18.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$101.7M$101.7M28.3%
Year 1$104.8M+$12.6M$117.4M32.6%
Year 2$107.9M+$18.9M$126.9M35.3%
Year 3$111.2M+$18.9M$130.1M36.2%
Year 4$114.5M+$18.9M$133.4M37.1%
Year 5$117.9M+$18.9M$136.9M38.0%
$1.02B
Entry EV (10x)
$1.51B
Exit EV (11x)
$488.2M
Value Created
$136.9M
Exit EBITDA
$162.0M
Organic Growth
$189.3M
RCM Value Creation
$136.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$8.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$115K$173K$230K$276K
Total$9.5M$14.2M$18.9M$22.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 97 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin28.3%-4.7%5.1%19.1%
P83
Net-to-Gross8.0%10.0%14.3%20.4%
P2
Occupancy80.4%57.4%66.5%75.3%
P86
Rev/Bed$1.0M$903K$1.2M$1.4M
P34
Exp/Bed$737K$823K$1.0M$1.3M
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML