Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DELRAY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DELRAY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100258 | FL | 324 beds | Current EBITDA $57.8M → Pro Forma $81.6M (+$23.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$453.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$57.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$81.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$23.8M
Modeled Uplift
$17.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.1M (vs $23.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$290K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.1M$9.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.7M$249K$9.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.1M$5.5M$17.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$290K$290K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.5M$6.8M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$145K$290K$290K$290K$290K$290K$290K
Cumulative$0$6.5M$13.0M$19.3M$23.8M$23.8M$23.8M$23.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
9.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
10.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
11.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
12.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$57.8M$57.8M12.7%
Year 1$59.5M+$15.9M$75.4M16.6%
Year 2$61.3M+$23.8M$85.2M18.8%
Year 3$63.1M+$23.8M$87.0M19.2%
Year 4$65.0M+$23.8M$88.9M19.6%
Year 5$67.0M+$23.8M$90.8M20.0%
$577.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$999.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$421.4M
Value Created
$90.8M
Exit EBITDA
$92.0M
Organic Growth
$238.5M
RCM Value Creation
$90.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.5M$6.8M$9.1M$10.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.5M$6.7M$9.0M$10.8M
A/R Days Reduction$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
Clean Claim Rate$145K$218K$290K$348K
Total$11.9M$17.9M$23.8M$28.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 104 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.7%-4.9%5.2%18.5%
P65
Net-to-Gross10.0%9.9%14.2%20.5%
P25
Occupancy76.7%56.6%66.3%75.4%
P80
Rev/Bed$1.4M$857K$1.2M$1.4M
P76
Exp/Bed$1.2M$777K$988K$1.3M
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML