Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA BAYONET POINT HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA BAYONET POINT HOSPITAL
CCN 100256 | FL | 290 beds | Current EBITDA $100.4M → Pro Forma $118.3M (+$17.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$339.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$100.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$118.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$17.9M
Modeled Uplift
$12.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.7M (vs $17.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$217K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.8M$6.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.5M$187K$6.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.0M$3.1M$4.1M$13.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$217K$217K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.0M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M$4.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$109K$217K$217K$217K$217K$217K$217K
Cumulative$0$4.9M$9.7M$14.5M$17.9M$17.9M$17.9M$17.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.3x
10.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$100.4M$100.4M29.6%
Year 1$103.4M+$11.9M$115.3M34.0%
Year 2$106.5M+$17.9M$124.4M36.6%
Year 3$109.7M+$17.9M$127.6M37.6%
Year 4$113.0M+$17.9M$130.9M38.5%
Year 5$116.4M+$17.9M$134.3M39.5%
$1.00B
Entry EV (10x)
$1.48B
Exit EV (11x)
$473.0M
Value Created
$134.3M
Exit EBITDA
$159.9M
Organic Growth
$178.7M
RCM Value Creation
$134.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$8.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.4M$5.0M$6.7M$8.1M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.1M$4.1M$5.0M
Clean Claim Rate$109K$163K$217K$261K
Total$8.9M$13.4M$17.9M$21.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 106 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin29.6%-5.0%3.7%17.0%
P89
Net-to-Gross8.4%10.1%14.4%20.5%
P8
Occupancy76.7%54.0%65.4%75.4%
P80
Rev/Bed$1.2M$850K$1.2M$1.4M
P50
Exp/Bed$825K$784K$988K$1.3M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML