Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — RAULERSON HOSPITAL 2026-04-27 01:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — RAULERSON HOSPITAL
CCN 100252 | FL | 100 beds | Current EBITDA $46.0M → Pro Forma $50.9M (+$4.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 100252

RAULERSON HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$92.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$46.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$50.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$4.9M
Modeled Uplift
$3.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.2M (vs $4.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$59K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$51K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$284K$841K$1.1M$3.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$59K$59K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$462K$924K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$457K$915K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$375K$750K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$30K$59K$59K$59K$59K$59K$59K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x
9.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x50% / 7.7x
10.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
11.0x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x
12.0x24% / 2.9x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x36% / 4.6x38% / 5.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.2x
Headroom (turns)
-18%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -18% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.7x, adding 0.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$46.0M$46.0M49.8%
Year 1$47.4M+$3.2M$50.7M54.8%
Year 2$48.9M+$4.9M$53.7M58.1%
Year 3$50.3M+$4.9M$55.2M59.7%
Year 4$51.8M+$4.9M$56.7M61.3%
Year 5$53.4M+$4.9M$58.2M63.0%
$460.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$640.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$180.2M
Value Created
$58.2M
Exit EBITDA
$73.3M
Organic Growth
$48.6M
RCM Value Creation
$58.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$924K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$915K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$562K$843K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$30K$44K$59K$71K
Total$2.4M$3.6M$4.9M$5.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 121 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin49.8%-6.8%5.0%14.0%
P99
Net-to-Gross12.6%13.3%20.5%37.5%
P22
Occupancy42.0%50.6%63.5%77.0%
P13
Rev/Bed$924K$310K$613K$1.2M
P61
Exp/Bed$464K$345K$683K$1.1M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML