Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LARGO MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 12:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LARGO MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100248 | FL | 245 beds | Current EBITDA $93.1M → Pro Forma $113.4M (+$20.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$386.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$93.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$113.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$20.3M
Modeled Uplift
$14.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.7M (vs $20.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$247K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.7M$7.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.4M$213K$7.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.5M$4.7M$14.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$247K$247K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$124K$247K$247K$247K$247K$247K$247K
Cumulative$0$5.5M$11.1M$16.5M$20.3M$20.3M$20.3M$20.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x
11.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$93.1M$93.1M24.1%
Year 1$95.9M+$13.6M$109.4M28.3%
Year 2$98.8M+$20.3M$119.1M30.8%
Year 3$101.7M+$20.3M$122.0M31.6%
Year 4$104.8M+$20.3M$125.1M32.4%
Year 5$107.9M+$20.3M$128.2M33.2%
$930.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.41B
Exit EV (11x)
$479.8M
Value Created
$128.2M
Exit EBITDA
$148.3M
Organic Growth
$203.3M
RCM Value Creation
$128.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.9M$5.8M$7.7M$9.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.8M$5.7M$7.7M$9.2M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$124K$185K$247K$297K
Total$10.2M$15.2M$20.3M$24.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 113 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin24.1%-5.2%2.8%16.9%
P83
Net-to-Gross9.9%10.0%14.5%20.9%
P23
Occupancy76.3%52.9%64.4%75.3%
P78
Rev/Bed$1.6M$825K$1.2M$1.4M
P82
Exp/Bed$1.2M$739K$970K$1.3M
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML