Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA BRANDON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA BRANDON HOSPITAL
CCN 100243 | FL | 403 beds | Current EBITDA $167.2M → Pro Forma $192.5M (+$25.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$480.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$167.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$25.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$192.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$25.3M
Modeled Uplift
$17.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.3M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.0M (vs $25.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$308K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$25.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.6M$9.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.3M$264K$9.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.4M$5.9M$18.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$308K$308K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.1M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$154K$308K$308K$308K$308K$308K$308K
Cumulative$0$6.9M$13.8M$20.5M$25.3M$25.3M$25.3M$25.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $25.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
9.0x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
10.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.0x
12.0x26% / 3.1x31% / 3.9x35% / 4.6x38% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$167.2M$167.2M34.8%
Year 1$172.2M+$16.9M$189.1M39.3%
Year 2$177.4M+$25.3M$202.7M42.1%
Year 3$182.7M+$25.3M$208.0M43.3%
Year 4$188.2M+$25.3M$213.5M44.4%
Year 5$193.8M+$25.3M$219.1M45.6%
$1.67B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.41B
Exit EV (11x)
$738.4M
Value Created
$219.1M
Exit EBITDA
$266.3M
Organic Growth
$253.0M
RCM Value Creation
$219.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.8M$7.1M$9.5M$11.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.0M
Clean Claim Rate$154K$231K$308K$369K
Total$12.6M$19.0M$25.3M$30.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 92 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin34.8%-4.7%4.2%18.1%
P93
Net-to-Gross8.9%10.0%14.4%20.5%
P10
Occupancy63.2%58.2%66.3%75.4%
P37
Rev/Bed$1.2M$922K$1.2M$1.4M
P51
Exp/Bed$778K$826K$1.0M$1.3M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML