Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA PUTNAM HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:48 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA PUTNAM HOSPITAL
CCN 100232 | FL | 82 beds | Current EBITDA $9.5M → Pro Forma $13.8M (+$4.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$82.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$9.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$4.4M
Modeled Uplift
$3.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.1M (vs $4.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$53K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$45K$1.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$254K$752K$1.0M$3.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$53K$53K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$413K$827K$1.2M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$409K$819K$1.2M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$335K$671K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$26K$53K$53K$53K$53K$53K$53K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.5M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.5x
9.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$9.5M$9.5M11.5%
Year 1$9.8M+$2.9M$12.7M15.3%
Year 2$10.1M+$4.4M$14.4M17.4%
Year 3$10.4M+$4.4M$14.7M17.8%
Year 4$10.7M+$4.4M$15.0M18.2%
Year 5$11.0M+$4.4M$15.3M18.5%
$94.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$168.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$73.9M
Value Created
$15.3M
Exit EBITDA
$15.1M
Organic Growth
$43.5M
RCM Value Creation
$15.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$827K$1.2M$1.7M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$819K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$503K$755K$1.0M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$26K$40K$53K$63K
Total$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 117 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.5%-10.2%2.6%11.7%
P72
Net-to-Gross10.2%14.8%21.7%38.5%
P9
Occupancy64.3%49.1%62.9%77.1%
P54
Rev/Bed$1.0M$294K$568K$1.1M
P67
Exp/Bed$893K$338K$624K$1.1M
P64

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML