Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA ORANGE PARK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA ORANGE PARK HOSPITAL
CCN 100226 | FL | 291 beds | Current EBITDA $95.5M → Pro Forma $117.5M (+$22.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$419.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$95.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$22.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$117.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$22.1M
Modeled Uplift
$16.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.2M (vs $22.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$269K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$22.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.4M$8.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.1M$231K$8.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.8M$5.1M$16.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$269K$269K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.2M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$134K$269K$269K$269K$269K$269K$269K
Cumulative$0$6.0M$12.0M$17.9M$22.1M$22.1M$22.1M$22.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $22.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x59% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$95.5M$95.5M22.7%
Year 1$98.3M+$14.7M$113.0M26.9%
Year 2$101.3M+$22.1M$123.4M29.4%
Year 3$104.3M+$22.1M$126.4M30.1%
Year 4$107.4M+$22.1M$129.5M30.8%
Year 5$110.7M+$22.1M$132.7M31.6%
$954.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.46B
Exit EV (11x)
$505.7M
Value Created
$132.7M
Exit EBITDA
$152.0M
Organic Growth
$220.9M
RCM Value Creation
$132.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$10.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.2M$6.2M$8.3M$10.0M
A/R Days Reduction$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
Clean Claim Rate$134K$202K$269K$322K
Total$11.0M$16.6M$22.1M$26.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 106 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.7%-5.0%3.9%17.0%
P79
Net-to-Gross8.2%10.0%14.4%20.5%
P6
Occupancy83.7%54.1%65.9%75.4%
P92
Rev/Bed$1.4M$854K$1.2M$1.4M
P76
Exp/Bed$1.1M$784K$1.0M$1.3M
P64

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML