Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GULF COAST MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GULF COAST MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100220 | FL | 624 beds | Current EBITDA $133.5M → Pro Forma $168.4M (+$34.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$664.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$133.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$34.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$168.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$34.9M
Modeled Uplift
$23.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.5M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $23.4M (vs $34.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$425K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$34.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.3M$13.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.8M$365K$13.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$6.0M$8.1M$25.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$425K$425K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.3M$6.6M$10.0M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.9M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$213K$425K$425K$425K$425K$425K$425K
Cumulative$0$9.5M$19.0M$28.3M$34.9M$34.9M$34.9M$34.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $34.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$133.5M$133.5M20.1%
Year 1$137.5M+$23.3M$160.8M24.2%
Year 2$141.6M+$34.9M$176.5M26.6%
Year 3$145.8M+$34.9M$180.8M27.2%
Year 4$150.2M+$34.9M$185.1M27.9%
Year 5$154.7M+$34.9M$189.7M28.6%
$1.33B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.09B
Exit EV (11x)
$751.6M
Value Created
$189.7M
Exit EBITDA
$212.6M
Organic Growth
$349.4M
RCM Value Creation
$189.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.6M$10.0M$13.3M$15.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.6M$9.9M$13.1M$15.8M
A/R Days Reduction$4.0M$6.1M$8.1M$9.7M
Clean Claim Rate$213K$319K$425K$510K
Total$17.5M$26.2M$34.9M$41.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 52 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.1%-5.9%6.2%15.7%
P78
Net-to-Gross19.7%10.3%17.8%20.9%
P65
Occupancy72.3%59.4%66.4%75.9%
P65
Rev/Bed$1.1M$1.0M$1.2M$1.7M
P25
Exp/Bed$850K$884K$1.1M$1.5M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML