Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SEBASTIAN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 17:19 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SEBASTIAN RIVER MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100217 | FL | 145 beds | Current EBITDA $3.3M → Pro Forma $9.7M (+$6.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$120.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$6.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.0M (vs $6.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$77K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$66K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$370K$1.1M$1.5M$4.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$77K$77K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$603K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$597K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$489K$978K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$39K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.1M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x80% / 19.1x85% / 21.6x89% / 24.1x91% / 25.3x93% / 26.6x
9.0x75% / 16.6x80% / 18.8x84% / 21.0x86% / 22.1x88% / 23.2x
10.0x71% / 14.6x75% / 16.6x79% / 18.6x81% / 19.6x83% / 20.6x
11.0x67% / 13.0x71% / 14.8x75% / 16.6x77% / 17.5x79% / 18.4x
12.0x63% / 11.7x68% / 13.3x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x75% / 16.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.6x
Headroom (turns)
55%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 55% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.9x, adding 5.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.3M$3.3M2.8%
Year 1$3.4M+$4.2M$7.7M6.4%
Year 2$3.5M+$6.3M$9.9M8.2%
Year 3$3.7M+$6.3M$10.0M8.3%
Year 4$3.8M+$6.3M$10.1M8.4%
Year 5$3.9M+$6.3M$10.2M8.5%
$33.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$112.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$79.0M
Value Created
$10.2M
Exit EBITDA
$5.3M
Organic Growth
$63.4M
RCM Value Creation
$10.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$733K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$39K$58K$77K$93K
Total$3.2M$4.8M$6.3M$7.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 130 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.8%-5.3%3.9%15.3%
P48
Net-to-Gross10.6%10.6%17.9%29.4%
P25
Occupancy35.0%51.2%64.0%74.9%
P8
Rev/Bed$831K$481K$959K$1.3M
P43
Exp/Bed$808K$501K$864K$1.2M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML