Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA OCALA HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA OCALA HOSPITAL
CCN 100212 | FL | 509 beds | Current EBITDA $209.9M → Pro Forma $250.0M (+$40.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$761.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$209.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$40.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$250.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$29.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$40.1M
Modeled Uplift
$28.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$11.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $28.5M (vs $40.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$487K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$40.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.2M$15.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$14.7M$419K$15.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.3M$6.9M$9.3M$29.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$487K$487K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT21.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.8M$7.5M$11.3M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M$15.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$244K$487K$487K$487K$487K$487K$487K
Cumulative$0$10.9M$21.8M$32.5M$40.1M$40.1M$40.1M$40.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $40.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x
11.0x32% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$209.9M$209.9M27.6%
Year 1$216.2M+$26.7M$242.9M31.9%
Year 2$222.7M+$40.1M$262.7M34.5%
Year 3$229.4M+$40.1M$269.4M35.4%
Year 4$236.2M+$40.1M$276.3M36.3%
Year 5$243.3M+$40.1M$283.4M37.2%
$2.10B
Entry EV (10x)
$3.12B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.02B
Value Created
$283.4M
Exit EBITDA
$334.3M
Organic Growth
$400.7M
RCM Value Creation
$283.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$18.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.5M$11.3M$15.1M$18.1M
A/R Days Reduction$4.6M$7.0M$9.3M$11.1M
Clean Claim Rate$244K$366K$487K$585K
Total$20.0M$30.1M$40.1M$48.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 76 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin27.6%-5.2%5.2%16.6%
P84
Net-to-Gross10.1%10.2%17.3%21.3%
P23
Occupancy82.3%60.0%66.7%76.7%
P83
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.0M$1.2M$1.6M
P71
Exp/Bed$1.1M$850K$1.1M$1.5M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML