Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA KENDALL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:19 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA KENDALL HOSPITAL
CCN 100209 | FL | 424 beds | Current EBITDA $190.7M → Pro Forma $219.2M (+$28.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$541.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$190.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$28.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$219.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$28.5M
Modeled Uplift
$19.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.3M (vs $28.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$346K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$28.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.8M$10.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.4M$298K$10.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$4.9M$6.6M$20.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$346K$346K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M$10.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.0M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M$6.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$173K$346K$346K$346K$346K$346K$346K
Cumulative$0$7.8M$15.5M$23.1M$28.5M$28.5M$28.5M$28.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $28.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
9.0x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
10.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x
12.0x26% / 3.1x31% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.9x
Headroom (turns)
-13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.4x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$190.7M$190.7M35.2%
Year 1$196.4M+$19.0M$215.4M39.8%
Year 2$202.3M+$28.5M$230.8M42.6%
Year 3$208.4M+$28.5M$236.9M43.8%
Year 4$214.6M+$28.5M$243.1M44.9%
Year 5$221.1M+$28.5M$249.6M46.1%
$1.91B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.75B
Exit EV (11x)
$838.0M
Value Created
$249.6M
Exit EBITDA
$303.7M
Organic Growth
$284.7M
RCM Value Creation
$249.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.4M$8.1M$10.8M$13.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.4M$8.0M$10.7M$12.9M
A/R Days Reduction$3.3M$4.9M$6.6M$7.9M
Clean Claim Rate$173K$260K$346K$416K
Total$14.2M$21.4M$28.5M$34.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 87 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin35.2%-4.9%4.1%17.1%
P97
Net-to-Gross10.2%10.1%14.7%20.5%
P29
Occupancy66.2%58.7%66.5%75.5%
P48
Rev/Bed$1.3M$919K$1.2M$1.5M
P62
Exp/Bed$827K$831K$1.0M$1.3M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML