Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA NORTH FLORIDA HOSP 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA NORTH FLORIDA HOSP
CCN 100204 | FL | 462 beds | Current EBITDA $182.5M → Pro Forma $215.7M (+$33.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$630.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$182.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$33.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$215.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$24.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$33.2M
Modeled Uplift
$23.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $23.9M (vs $33.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$404K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$33.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.6M$12.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.1M$347K$12.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.9M$5.7M$7.7M$24.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$404K$404K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.2M$6.3M$9.5M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M$12.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.4M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M$12.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.6M$5.1M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M$7.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$202K$404K$404K$404K$404K$404K$404K
Cumulative$0$9.0M$18.1M$26.9M$33.2M$33.2M$33.2M$33.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $33.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
9.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.7x39% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$182.5M$182.5M28.9%
Year 1$187.9M+$22.1M$210.1M33.3%
Year 2$193.6M+$33.2M$226.8M36.0%
Year 3$199.4M+$33.2M$232.6M36.9%
Year 4$205.4M+$33.2M$238.6M37.8%
Year 5$211.5M+$33.2M$244.7M38.8%
$1.82B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.69B
Exit EV (11x)
$867.2M
Value Created
$244.7M
Exit EBITDA
$290.6M
Organic Growth
$331.8M
RCM Value Creation
$244.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.3M$9.5M$12.6M$15.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.2M$9.4M$12.5M$15.0M
A/R Days Reduction$3.8M$5.8M$7.7M$9.2M
Clean Claim Rate$202K$303K$404K$484K
Total$16.6M$24.9M$33.2M$39.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 82 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin28.9%-5.4%4.2%18.8%
P85
Net-to-Gross9.1%10.1%14.5%20.4%
P10
Occupancy86.5%59.7%66.7%75.8%
P94
Rev/Bed$1.4M$932K$1.2M$1.5M
P65
Exp/Bed$970K$836K$1.1M$1.3M
P39

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML