Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CENTER OF TRINITY 2026-04-26 12:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CENTER OF TRINITY
CCN 100191 | FL | 330 beds | Current EBITDA $30.8M → Pro Forma $47.0M (+$16.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$307.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$30.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$47.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$16.2M
Modeled Uplift
$10.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.6M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.6M (vs $16.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$197K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.2M$6.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.9M$169K$6.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$944K$2.8M$3.7M$11.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$197K$197K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.6M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M$6.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.5M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$98K$197K$197K$197K$197K$197K$197K
Cumulative$0$4.4M$8.8M$13.1M$16.2M$16.2M$16.2M$16.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x67% / 13.2x
9.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x
10.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
11.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
12.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.0x
Headroom (turns)
15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.5x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$30.8M$30.8M10.0%
Year 1$31.8M+$10.8M$42.6M13.8%
Year 2$32.7M+$16.2M$48.9M15.9%
Year 3$33.7M+$16.2M$49.9M16.2%
Year 4$34.7M+$16.2M$50.9M16.5%
Year 5$35.8M+$16.2M$51.9M16.9%
$308.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$571.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$263.0M
Value Created
$51.9M
Exit EBITDA
$49.1M
Organic Growth
$161.9M
RCM Value Creation
$51.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.1M$4.6M$6.2M$7.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.6M$6.1M$7.3M
A/R Days Reduction$1.9M$2.8M$3.7M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$98K$148K$197K$236K
Total$8.1M$12.1M$16.2M$19.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 104 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.0%-4.9%5.2%18.5%
P56
Net-to-Gross8.0%9.9%14.2%20.5%
P5
Occupancy52.4%56.6%66.3%75.4%
P18
Rev/Bed$932K$857K$1.2M$1.4M
P32
Exp/Bed$839K$777K$988K$1.3M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML