Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100189 | FL | 289 beds | Current EBITDA $49.3M → Pro Forma $63.2M (+$13.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$262.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$49.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$63.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$13.8M
Modeled Uplift
$9.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.4M (vs $13.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$168K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.3M$5.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.1M$145K$5.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$806K$2.4M$3.2M$10.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$168K$168K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M$5.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$84K$168K$168K$168K$168K$168K$168K
Cumulative$0$3.8M$7.5M$11.2M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
9.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
11.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x
12.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$49.3M$49.3M18.8%
Year 1$50.8M+$9.2M$60.0M22.8%
Year 2$52.3M+$13.8M$66.2M25.2%
Year 3$53.9M+$13.8M$67.7M25.8%
Year 4$55.5M+$13.8M$69.4M26.4%
Year 5$57.2M+$13.8M$71.0M27.0%
$493.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$781.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$287.9M
Value Created
$71.0M
Exit EBITDA
$78.6M
Organic Growth
$138.3M
RCM Value Creation
$71.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.6M$3.9M$5.3M$6.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$84K$126K$168K$202K
Total$6.9M$10.4M$13.8M$16.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 106 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.8%-5.0%3.7%17.0%
P76
Net-to-Gross9.4%10.1%14.4%20.5%
P14
Occupancy61.6%54.0%65.4%75.4%
P40
Rev/Bed$909K$850K$1.2M$1.4M
P30
Exp/Bed$739K$784K$988K$1.3M
P21

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML