Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CORAL GABLES HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 19:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CORAL GABLES HOSPITAL
CCN 100183 | FL | 245 beds | Current EBITDA $445K → Pro Forma $6.5M (+$6.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$114.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$445K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

59%
Realization (C)
$6.0M
Modeled Uplift
$3.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 59% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.5M (vs $6.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$73K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.3M$2.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.2M$63K$2.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$351K$1.0M$1.4M$4.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$73K$73K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$573K$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$567K$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$464K$929K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$37K$73K$73K$73K$73K$73K$73K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x153% / 104.1x159% / 116.1x164% / 128.0x166% / 134.0x169% / 139.9x
9.0x147% / 92.2x153% / 102.8x158% / 113.4x160% / 118.7x162% / 124.0x
10.0x142% / 82.7x147% / 92.2x152% / 101.8x154% / 106.5x157% / 111.3x
11.0x137% / 74.8x142% / 83.5x147% / 92.2x149% / 96.5x152% / 100.9x
12.0x133% / 68.3x138% / 76.3x143% / 84.2x145% / 88.2x147% / 92.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.9x
Headroom (turns)
91%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 91% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.6x, adding 7.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$445K$445K0.4%
Year 1$459K+$4.0M$4.5M3.9%
Year 2$473K+$6.0M$6.5M5.7%
Year 3$487K+$6.0M$6.5M5.7%
Year 4$501K+$6.0M$6.5M5.7%
Year 5$516K+$6.0M$6.5M5.7%
$4.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$71.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$67.5M
Value Created
$6.5M
Exit EBITDA
$709K
Organic Growth
$60.2M
RCM Value Creation
$6.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.7M$2.3M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$697K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$37K$55K$73K$88K
Total$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 113 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.4%-5.2%2.8%16.9%
P41
Net-to-Gross10.1%10.0%14.5%20.9%
P26
Occupancy19.9%52.9%64.4%75.3%
P0
Rev/Bed$467K$825K$1.2M$1.4M
P8
Exp/Bed$466K$739K$970K$1.3M
P8

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML