Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ADVENTHEALTH TAMPA 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ADVENTHEALTH TAMPA
CCN 100173 | FL | 596 beds | Current EBITDA $-59.6M → Pro Forma $-22.8M (+$36.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$699.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-59.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$36.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-22.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$26.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$36.8M
Modeled Uplift
$23.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$13.0M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $23.8M (vs $36.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$14.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$447K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$36.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$14.0M$14.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.5M$385K$13.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.4M$8.5M$26.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$447K$447K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT21.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.5M$7.0M$10.5M$14.0M$14.0M$14.0M$14.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.5M$6.9M$10.4M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.8M$5.7M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M$8.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$224K$447K$447K$447K$447K$447K$447K
Cumulative$0$10.0M$20.0M$29.8M$36.8M$36.8M$36.8M$36.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $36.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-59.6M$-59.6M-8.5%
Year 1$-61.4M+$24.5M$-36.9M-5.3%
Year 2$-63.3M+$36.8M$-26.5M-3.8%
Year 3$-65.2M+$36.8M$-28.4M-4.1%
Year 4$-67.1M+$36.8M$-30.3M-4.3%
Year 5$-69.1M+$36.8M$-32.3M-4.6%
$-596.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-355.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$240.5M
Value Created
$-32.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-95.0M
Organic Growth
$367.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-32.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.0M$10.5M$14.0M$16.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.9M$10.4M$13.8M$16.6M
A/R Days Reduction$4.3M$6.4M$8.5M$10.2M
Clean Claim Rate$224K$336K$447K$537K
Total$18.4M$27.6M$36.8M$44.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.5%-7.0%5.7%15.7%
P20
Net-to-Gross17.3%10.4%18.6%21.3%
P44
Occupancy60.9%59.3%66.2%76.1%
P31
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.0M$1.2M$1.7M
P37
Exp/Bed$1.3M$898K$1.1M$1.6M
P60

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML