Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA MERCY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HCA FLORIDA MERCY HOSPITAL
CCN 100167 | FL | 290 beds | Current EBITDA $54.1M → Pro Forma $73.6M (+$19.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$371.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$54.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$73.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$19.5M
Modeled Uplift
$13.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.6M (vs $19.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$238K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.4M$7.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.2M$204K$7.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.4M$4.5M$14.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$238K$238K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$119K$238K$238K$238K$238K$238K$238K
Cumulative$0$5.3M$10.6M$15.9M$19.5M$19.5M$19.5M$19.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.3x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x
9.0x46% / 6.6x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
10.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
11.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.3x
Headroom (turns)
4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.2x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$54.1M$54.1M14.6%
Year 1$55.7M+$13.0M$68.7M18.5%
Year 2$57.4M+$19.5M$76.9M20.7%
Year 3$59.1M+$19.5M$78.6M21.2%
Year 4$60.9M+$19.5M$80.4M21.6%
Year 5$62.7M+$19.5M$82.2M22.1%
$540.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$904.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$363.9M
Value Created
$82.2M
Exit EBITDA
$86.1M
Organic Growth
$195.5M
RCM Value Creation
$82.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.7M$5.5M$7.4M$8.8M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$119K$178K$238K$285K
Total$9.8M$14.7M$19.5M$23.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 106 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.6%-5.0%3.7%17.0%
P70
Net-to-Gross9.6%10.1%14.4%20.5%
P18
Occupancy67.4%54.0%65.4%75.4%
P56
Rev/Bed$1.3M$850K$1.2M$1.4M
P68
Exp/Bed$1.1M$784K$988K$1.3M
P61

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML