Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAKELAND REGIONAL MED CTR 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAKELAND REGIONAL MED CTR
CCN 100157 | FL | 764 beds | Current EBITDA $38.8M → Pro Forma $87.6M (+$48.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$928.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$38.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$48.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$87.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$35.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$48.8M
Modeled Uplift
$32.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$16.5M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $32.4M (vs $48.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$18.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$18.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$11.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$594K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$48.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$18.6M$18.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$17.9M$510K$18.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.8M$8.4M$11.3M$35.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$594K$594K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT21.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.6M$9.3M$13.9M$18.6M$18.6M$18.6M$18.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.6M$9.2M$13.8M$18.4M$18.4M$18.4M$18.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.8M$7.5M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M$11.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$297K$594K$594K$594K$594K$594K$594K
Cumulative$0$13.3M$26.6M$39.6M$48.8M$48.8M$48.8M$48.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $48.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x71% / 14.4x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.3x83% / 20.3x
9.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.8x78% / 17.7x
10.0x61% / 10.9x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x
11.0x57% / 9.6x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.5x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x
12.0x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.8x
Headroom (turns)
42%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 42% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.7x, adding 4.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$38.8M$38.8M4.2%
Year 1$40.0M+$32.5M$72.5M7.8%
Year 2$41.2M+$48.8M$90.0M9.7%
Year 3$42.4M+$48.8M$91.2M9.8%
Year 4$43.7M+$48.8M$92.5M10.0%
Year 5$45.0M+$48.8M$93.8M10.1%
$388.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.03B
Exit EV (11x)
$643.8M
Value Created
$93.8M
Exit EBITDA
$61.8M
Organic Growth
$488.2M
RCM Value Creation
$93.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$9.3M$13.9M$18.6M$22.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$9.2M$13.8M$18.4M$22.0M
A/R Days Reduction$5.6M$8.5M$11.3M$13.6M
Clean Claim Rate$297K$445K$594K$713K
Total$24.4M$36.6M$48.8M$58.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.2%-7.0%4.2%12.7%
P49
Net-to-Gross18.5%13.6%19.0%21.4%
P40
Occupancy75.0%61.6%68.1%75.9%
P69
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.2M$1.3M$1.8M
P40
Exp/Bed$1.2M$1.1M$1.2M$1.7M
P47

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML