Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH MIAMI HOSPITAL
CCN 100154 | FL | 375 beds | Current EBITDA $80.0M → Pro Forma $116.2M (+$36.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$688.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$80.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$36.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$116.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$26.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$36.2M
Modeled Uplift
$24.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.0M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $24.2M (vs $36.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$441K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$36.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.8M$13.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.3M$379K$13.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.3M$8.4M$26.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$441K$441K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.4M$6.9M$10.3M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.4M$6.8M$10.2M$13.6M$13.6M$13.6M$13.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.8M$5.6M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M$8.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$220K$441K$441K$441K$441K$441K$441K
Cumulative$0$9.9M$19.7M$29.4M$36.2M$36.2M$36.2M$36.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $36.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
9.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$80.0M$80.0M11.6%
Year 1$82.4M+$24.1M$106.6M15.5%
Year 2$84.9M+$36.2M$121.1M17.6%
Year 3$87.4M+$36.2M$123.7M18.0%
Year 4$90.1M+$36.2M$126.3M18.3%
Year 5$92.8M+$36.2M$129.0M18.7%
$800.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.42B
Exit EV (11x)
$618.6M
Value Created
$129.0M
Exit EBITDA
$127.4M
Organic Growth
$362.2M
RCM Value Creation
$129.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.9M$10.3M$13.8M$16.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.8M$10.2M$13.6M$16.4M
A/R Days Reduction$4.2M$6.3M$8.4M$10.1M
Clean Claim Rate$220K$330K$441K$529K
Total$18.1M$27.2M$36.2M$43.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 97 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.6%-4.7%4.5%19.1%
P60
Net-to-Gross26.6%10.0%14.2%20.4%
P93
Occupancy57.4%57.4%65.7%75.3%
P26
Rev/Bed$1.8M$903K$1.2M$1.4M
P91
Exp/Bed$1.6M$823K$1.0M$1.3M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML