Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST MEDICAL CTR-NASSAU 2026-04-26 18:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST MEDICAL CTR-NASSAU
CCN 100140 | FL | 54 beds | Current EBITDA $1.8M → Pro Forma $6.2M (+$4.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$85.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$4.5M
Modeled Uplift
$3.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.1M (vs $4.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$54K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$47K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$261K$774K$1.0M$3.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$54K$54K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$425K$851K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$421K$842K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$345K$690K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$27K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x88% / 23.8x93% / 26.8x97% / 29.8x99% / 31.3x101% / 32.8x
9.0x83% / 20.8x88% / 23.4x92% / 26.1x94% / 27.4x96% / 28.8x
10.0x79% / 18.4x83% / 20.8x88% / 23.2x89% / 24.4x91% / 25.6x
11.0x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.6x83% / 20.8x85% / 21.9x87% / 23.0x
12.0x71% / 14.8x76% / 16.8x80% / 18.8x82% / 19.8x83% / 20.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.1x
Headroom (turns)
63%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 63% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.4x, adding 6.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.8M$1.8M2.1%
Year 1$1.8M+$3.0M$4.8M5.6%
Year 2$1.9M+$4.5M$6.3M7.5%
Year 3$1.9M+$4.5M$6.4M7.5%
Year 4$2.0M+$4.5M$6.5M7.6%
Year 5$2.0M+$4.5M$6.5M7.7%
$17.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$71.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$54.1M
Value Created
$6.5M
Exit EBITDA
$2.8M
Organic Growth
$44.7M
RCM Value Creation
$6.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$851K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$842K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$517K$776K$1.0M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$27K$41K$54K$65K
Total$2.2M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.1%-12.1%4.6%12.7%
P44
Net-to-Gross20.6%15.7%26.3%46.3%
P40
Occupancy56.3%48.7%62.3%81.5%
P40
Rev/Bed$1.6M$235K$481K$760K
P93
Exp/Bed$1.5M$268K$504K$886K
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML