Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAKESIDE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 17:18 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAKESIDE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100130 | FL | 54 beds | Current EBITDA $2.1M → Pro Forma $3.5M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$835K
Risk-Adjusted
-$549K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$526K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$521K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$320K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$526K$526K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$507K$14K$521K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$81K$239K$320K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$132K$263K$395K$526K$526K$526K$526K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$130K$261K$391K$521K$521K$521K$521K
A/R Days Reduction$0$107K$213K$320K$320K$320K$320K$320K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$377K$754K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
11.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.1M$2.1M8.0%
Year 1$2.2M+$923K$3.1M11.7%
Year 2$2.2M+$1.4M$3.6M13.7%
Year 3$2.3M+$1.4M$3.7M14.0%
Year 4$2.4M+$1.4M$3.8M14.3%
Year 5$2.4M+$1.4M$3.8M14.5%
$21.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$42.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.0M
Value Created
$3.8M
Exit EBITDA
$3.4M
Organic Growth
$13.8M
RCM Value Creation
$3.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$263K$395K$526K$632K
Denial Rate Reductio$261K$391K$521K$625K
A/R Days Reduction$160K$240K$320K$384K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$13K$17K$20K
Total$692K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-12.1%4.6%12.7%
P0
Net-to-Gross20.5%15.7%26.3%46.3%
P38
Occupancy21.3%48.7%62.3%81.5%
P5
Rev/Bed$487K$235K$481K$760K
P50
Exp/Bed$1.1M$268K$504K$886K
P86

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML