Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BARTOW REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BARTOW REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100121 | FL | 72 beds | Current EBITDA $10.3M → Pro Forma $15.1M (+$4.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$90.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$4.8M
Modeled Uplift
$3.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.2M (vs $4.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$58K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$50K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$279K$827K$1.1M$3.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$58K$58K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$454K$909K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$450K$899K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$369K$737K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$29K$58K$58K$58K$58K$58K$58K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
9.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
10.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.3M$10.3M11.3%
Year 1$10.6M+$3.2M$13.8M15.2%
Year 2$10.9M+$4.8M$15.7M17.3%
Year 3$11.3M+$4.8M$16.0M17.6%
Year 4$11.6M+$4.8M$16.4M18.0%
Year 5$11.9M+$4.8M$16.7M18.4%
$103.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$183.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$80.9M
Value Created
$16.7M
Exit EBITDA
$16.4M
Organic Growth
$47.8M
RCM Value Creation
$16.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$909K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$899K$1.3M$1.8M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$553K$829K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$29K$44K$58K$70K
Total$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 118 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.3%-9.7%3.1%11.8%
P70
Net-to-Gross20.4%15.5%23.8%39.2%
P40
Occupancy45.8%50.9%63.8%77.4%
P18
Rev/Bed$1.3M$241K$517K$1.1M
P83
Exp/Bed$1.1M$312K$568K$1.1M
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML