Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OSCEOLA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OSCEOLA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100110 | FL | 351 beds | Current EBITDA $137.2M → Pro Forma $161.1M (+$23.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$453.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$137.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$161.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$23.8M
Modeled Uplift
$17.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.2M (vs $23.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$290K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.1M$9.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.7M$249K$9.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.1M$5.5M$17.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$290K$290K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.5M$6.8M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$145K$290K$290K$290K$290K$290K$290K
Cumulative$0$6.5M$13.0M$19.3M$23.8M$23.8M$23.8M$23.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x27% / 3.2x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$137.2M$137.2M30.3%
Year 1$141.3M+$15.9M$157.2M34.7%
Year 2$145.6M+$23.8M$169.4M37.4%
Year 3$150.0M+$23.8M$173.8M38.3%
Year 4$154.5M+$23.8M$178.3M39.3%
Year 5$159.1M+$23.8M$182.9M40.4%
$1.37B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.01B
Exit EV (11x)
$640.0M
Value Created
$182.9M
Exit EBITDA
$218.6M
Organic Growth
$238.5M
RCM Value Creation
$182.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.5M$6.8M$9.1M$10.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.5M$6.7M$9.0M$10.8M
A/R Days Reduction$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
Clean Claim Rate$145K$218K$290K$348K
Total$11.9M$17.9M$23.8M$28.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 97 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin30.3%-4.7%5.1%19.1%
P90
Net-to-Gross9.5%10.0%14.3%20.4%
P17
Occupancy83.6%57.4%66.5%75.3%
P91
Rev/Bed$1.3M$903K$1.2M$1.4M
P70
Exp/Bed$900K$823K$1.0M$1.3M
P36

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML