Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LEHIGH REGIONAL 2026-04-26 15:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LEHIGH REGIONAL
CCN 100107 | FL | 53 beds | Current EBITDA $2.7M → Pro Forma $4.9M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$41.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$719K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$826K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$818K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$503K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$826K$826K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$795K$23K$818K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$127K$376K$503K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$207K$413K$620K$826K$826K$826K$826K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$204K$409K$613K$818K$818K$818K$818K
A/R Days Reduction$0$168K$335K$503K$503K$503K$503K$503K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$592K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.7x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x
9.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x
10.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
11.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.6x
12.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.8x
Headroom (turns)
28%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 28% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.7x, adding 3.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.7M$2.7M6.6%
Year 1$2.8M+$1.4M$4.3M10.3%
Year 2$2.9M+$2.2M$5.1M12.3%
Year 3$3.0M+$2.2M$5.2M12.5%
Year 4$3.1M+$2.2M$5.2M12.7%
Year 5$3.2M+$2.2M$5.3M12.9%
$27.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$58.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$31.4M
Value Created
$5.3M
Exit EBITDA
$4.3M
Organic Growth
$21.7M
RCM Value Creation
$5.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$413K$620K$826K$991K
Denial Rate Reductio$409K$613K$818K$982K
A/R Days Reduction$251K$377K$503K$603K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$26K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.6%-12.2%4.9%12.7%
P57
Net-to-Gross13.2%15.7%25.3%46.5%
P15
Occupancy49.7%48.7%62.7%81.5%
P27
Rev/Bed$779K$241K$487K$779K
P74
Exp/Bed$728K$268K$507K$890K
P70

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML