Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ROCKLEDGE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 12:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ROCKLEDGE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 100092 | FL | 274 beds | Current EBITDA $7K → Pro Forma $9.1M (+$9.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$173.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$6.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$9.1M
Modeled Uplift
$5.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.6M (vs $9.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$111K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.5M$3.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.3M$96K$3.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$533K$1.6M$2.1M$6.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$111K$111K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$869K$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$860K$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$705K$1.4M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$56K$111K$111K$111K$111K$111K$111K
Cumulative$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.4M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x531% / 9988.6x544% / 11098.8x557% / 12209.0x563% / 12764.1x568% / 13319.2x
9.0x516% / 8878.4x529% / 9865.3x541% / 10852.1x547% / 11345.5x553% / 11839.0x
10.0x503% / 7990.2x516% / 8878.4x528% / 9766.6x534% / 10210.7x539% / 10654.8x
11.0x492% / 7263.6x504% / 8071.0x516% / 8878.4x522% / 9282.1x527% / 9685.8x
12.0x482% / 6658.0x494% / 7398.1x505% / 8138.3x511% / 8508.4x516% / 8878.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.5x
Headroom (turns)
100%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 100% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.0x, adding 8.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7K$7K0.0%
Year 1$7K+$6.1M$6.1M3.5%
Year 2$7K+$9.1M$9.1M5.3%
Year 3$7K+$9.1M$9.1M5.3%
Year 4$8K+$9.1M$9.1M5.3%
Year 5$8K+$9.1M$9.1M5.3%
$67K
Entry EV (10x)
$100.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$100.5M
Value Created
$9.1M
Exit EBITDA
$11K
Organic Growth
$91.4M
RCM Value Creation
$9.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.7M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.7M$2.6M$3.4M$4.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
Clean Claim Rate$56K$83K$111K$133K
Total$4.6M$6.9M$9.1M$11.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 107 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.0%-4.9%3.2%17.3%
P42
Net-to-Gross11.6%9.9%14.1%20.5%
P42
Occupancy34.1%52.7%64.7%75.4%
P6
Rev/Bed$634K$830K$1.2M$1.4M
P12
Exp/Bed$634K$753K$970K$1.3M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML