Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SARASOTA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 100087 | FL | 787 beds | Current EBITDA $89.1M → Pro Forma $146.9M (+$57.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.10B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$89.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$57.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$146.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$42.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$57.7M
Modeled Uplift
$37.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$19.9M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $37.9M (vs $57.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$21.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$21.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$13.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$702K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$57.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$21.9M$21.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$21.1M$604K$21.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.4M$10.0M$13.4M$42.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$702K$702K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT21.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.5M$11.0M$16.5M$21.9M$21.9M$21.9M$21.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.4M$10.9M$16.3M$21.7M$21.7M$21.7M$21.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.5M$8.9M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$351K$702K$702K$702K$702K$702K$702K
Cumulative$0$15.7M$31.4M$46.8M$57.7M$57.7M$57.7M$57.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $57.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 10.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.4x
9.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x65% / 12.4x
10.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.8x
11.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$89.1M$89.1M8.1%
Year 1$91.8M+$38.5M$130.3M11.9%
Year 2$94.6M+$57.7M$152.3M13.9%
Year 3$97.4M+$57.7M$155.1M14.1%
Year 4$100.3M+$57.7M$158.1M14.4%
Year 5$103.3M+$57.7M$161.1M14.7%
$891.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.77B
Exit EV (11x)
$880.4M
Value Created
$161.1M
Exit EBITDA
$142.0M
Organic Growth
$577.3M
RCM Value Creation
$161.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$11.0M$16.5M$21.9M$26.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$10.9M$16.3M$21.7M$26.1M
A/R Days Reduction$6.7M$10.0M$13.4M$16.0M
Clean Claim Rate$351K$527K$702K$843K
Total$28.9M$43.3M$57.7M$69.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.1%-7.0%4.1%11.9%
P62
Net-to-Gross19.0%14.2%19.0%21.4%
P47
Occupancy70.1%62.2%68.5%76.5%
P56
Rev/Bed$1.4M$1.2M$1.3M$1.8M
P56
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.1M$1.3M$1.8M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML