Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BROWARD HEALTH NORTH 2026-04-26 06:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BROWARD HEALTH NORTH
CCN 100086 | FL | 304 beds | Current EBITDA $-43.8M → Pro Forma $-30.4M (+$13.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$254.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-43.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-30.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$13.4M
Modeled Uplift
$8.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.6M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.7M (vs $13.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$163K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.1M$5.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.9M$140K$5.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$780K$2.3M$3.1M$9.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$163K$163K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$81K$163K$163K$163K$163K$163K$163K
Cumulative$0$3.6M$7.3M$10.8M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-43.8M$-43.8M-17.2%
Year 1$-45.1M+$8.9M$-36.2M-14.2%
Year 2$-46.4M+$13.4M$-33.1M-13.0%
Year 3$-47.8M+$13.4M$-34.5M-13.6%
Year 4$-49.3M+$13.4M$-35.9M-14.1%
Year 5$-50.7M+$13.4M$-37.4M-14.7%
$-437.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-411.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$26.6M
Value Created
$-37.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-69.7M
Organic Growth
$133.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-37.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.5M$3.8M$5.0M$6.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.5M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$81K$122K$163K$195K
Total$6.7M$10.0M$13.4M$16.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 105 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-17.2%-5.8%4.4%17.3%
P6
Net-to-Gross18.9%10.0%14.3%20.5%
P64
Occupancy52.9%54.4%65.7%75.3%
P21
Rev/Bed$836K$853K$1.2M$1.4M
P23
Exp/Bed$980K$778K$997K$1.3M
P49

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML