Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HOSP & CLINICS 2026-04-26 03:56 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI HOSP & CLINICS
CCN 100079 | FL | 532 beds | Current EBITDA $22.4M → Pro Forma $146.7M (+$124.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.36B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$22.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$124.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$146.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$90.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$124.3M
Modeled Uplift
$89.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$35.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $89.1M (vs $124.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$47.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$46.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$28.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$1.5M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$124.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$47.3M$47.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$45.5M$1.3M$46.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$7.3M$21.5M$28.8M$90.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$11.8M$23.6M$35.5M$47.3M$47.3M$47.3M$47.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$11.7M$23.4M$35.1M$46.8M$46.8M$46.8M$46.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$9.6M$19.2M$28.8M$28.8M$28.8M$28.8M$28.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$756K$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Cumulative$0$33.9M$67.7M$100.8M$124.3M$124.3M$124.3M$124.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $124.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x115% / 45.9x120% / 51.3x124% / 56.8x126% / 59.5x128% / 62.2x
9.0x110% / 40.4x114% / 45.3x119% / 50.1x121% / 52.5x123% / 55.0x
10.0x105% / 36.0x110% / 40.4x114% / 44.8x116% / 47.0x118% / 49.1x
11.0x101% / 32.5x105% / 36.5x110% / 40.4x112% / 42.4x114% / 44.4x
12.0x97% / 29.5x101% / 33.1x106% / 36.8x108% / 38.6x110% / 40.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.2x
Headroom (turns)
80%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 80% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.3x, adding 7.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$22.4M$22.4M0.9%
Year 1$23.0M+$82.9M$105.9M4.5%
Year 2$23.7M+$124.3M$148.1M6.3%
Year 3$24.4M+$124.3M$148.8M6.3%
Year 4$25.2M+$124.3M$149.5M6.3%
Year 5$25.9M+$124.3M$150.3M6.4%
$223.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.65B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.43B
Value Created
$150.3M
Exit EBITDA
$35.6M
Organic Growth
$1.24B
RCM Value Creation
$150.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$23.6M$35.5M$47.3M$56.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$23.4M$35.1M$46.8M$56.2M
A/R Days Reduction$14.4M$21.6M$28.8M$34.5M
Clean Claim Rate$756K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Total$62.2M$93.3M$124.3M$149.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.9%-5.8%5.1%17.7%
P40
Net-to-Gross19.2%10.2%17.0%20.7%
P65
Occupancy68.3%60.1%66.6%76.7%
P57
Rev/Bed$4.4M$1.0M$1.2M$1.5M
P99
Exp/Bed$4.4M$848K$1.1M$1.4M
P99

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML