Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. ANTHONYS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:56 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. ANTHONYS HOSPITAL
CCN 100067 | FL | 398 beds | Current EBITDA $28.9M → Pro Forma $53.2M (+$24.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$463.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$28.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$53.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$24.4M
Modeled Uplift
$16.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.2M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.1M (vs $24.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$297K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.3M$9.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.9M$255K$9.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.2M$5.6M$17.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$297K$297K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT20.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.6M$7.0M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$148K$297K$297K$297K$297K$297K$297K
Cumulative$0$6.6M$13.3M$19.8M$24.4M$24.4M$24.4M$24.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.0x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x
9.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x
10.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x
11.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x
12.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.9x
Headroom (turns)
29%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 29% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$28.9M$28.9M6.2%
Year 1$29.7M+$16.3M$46.0M9.9%
Year 2$30.6M+$24.4M$55.0M11.9%
Year 3$31.5M+$24.4M$55.9M12.1%
Year 4$32.5M+$24.4M$56.9M12.3%
Year 5$33.4M+$24.4M$57.8M12.5%
$288.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$636.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$347.7M
Value Created
$57.8M
Exit EBITDA
$46.0M
Organic Growth
$243.9M
RCM Value Creation
$57.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.6M$7.0M$9.3M$11.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$11.0M
A/R Days Reduction$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.8M
Clean Claim Rate$148K$222K$297K$356K
Total$12.2M$18.3M$24.4M$29.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 95 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.2%-4.5%4.6%18.0%
P53
Net-to-Gross21.4%10.0%14.3%20.5%
P79
Occupancy58.4%58.7%66.5%75.4%
P24
Rev/Bed$1.2M$919K$1.2M$1.4M
P44
Exp/Bed$1.1M$826K$1.0M$1.3M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML